Concealed carry is generally the safer and more tactical choice for everyday self-defense, offering strategic advantages over open carry.
Comfort should not outweigh the effectiveness of concealed carry—most people adjust with training and purpose.
The minor speed advantage of open carry draw rarely matters in real self-defense; concealed carry provides time to assess situations legally and tactically.
Relying on open carry as a visible deterrent is risky and can make you a target rather than prevent crime.
Concealed carry offers a critical tactical edge through the element of surprise, disrupting criminal intent.
Open carry is mainly practical for wildlife defense or competitive shooting, not typical daily carry.
Whichever method you choose, base your decision on personal context, training, and legal preparedness—and always have a self-defense legal plan.
This article summarizes key insights from Uncle Zo’s original post titled “To Open Carry or Concealed Carry?” and is shared with full credit to the original author. Uncle Zo offers a thoughtful, experience-based breakdown of one of the most debated questions in the firearms community: is open carry or concealed carry better for armed civilians?
Concealed Carry Is the Preferred Choice for Defensive Contexts
Uncle Zo firmly believes that for the average armed citizen defending against criminal threats, concealed carry is the more tactical and practical choice. While open carry may offer comfort and marginally faster draw times, those advantages are outweighed by the strategic benefits of concealment.
Comfort vs. Concealment: What Really Matters?
While open carry is more physically comfortable, Uncle Zo argues that comfort shouldn’t override effectiveness. Just like we acclimate to wearing shoes, we can get used to concealed carry—and that comfort will come with time, training, and purpose.
Further Reading
Speed of Draw: Is It Worth the Risk?
Yes, drawing from open carry is faster. But as Uncle Zo explains, that fraction-of-a-second advantage rarely tips the scale in real-world self-defense. Concealed carriers may gain something more important: time to assess the situation and make legally sound decisions before engaging.
The Fallacy of the Visible Deterrent
Some argue that simply wearing a visible firearm deters criminals. Uncle Zo warns that this assumption is risky. Criminals don’t think like law-abiding citizens—and a visible gun may actually make you a target for theft or a preemptive attack.
The Power of Surprise
One of the strongest arguments for concealed carry is the tactical advantage of surprise. Criminals expect compliance, not resistance. When a concealed firearm is presented unexpectedly, it disrupts their plan and gives the defender an edge in a potentially deadly situation.
When Does Open Carry Make Sense?
While concealed carry is the clear winner for daily civilian defense, Uncle Zo acknowledges two scenarios where open carry is practical:
-
Wildlife defense: Concealment offers no advantage in this case.
-
Competitive shooting: Speed is critical, and retention holsters may slow you down.
Make an Informed Decision - And Be Legally Protected
No matter which method you choose, Uncle Zo emphasizes that the decision should be informed by your context, training, and preparedness. He also reminds readers to consider the legal aftermath of a defensive gun use. If you carry, you need a self-defense legal plan in place.
We recommend Right To Bear Legal Defense as a trusted option for self-defense insurance. For less than 50 cents a day, you get 24/7 access to attorneys, unlimited legal protection, and no payback requirement. Learn more at www.protectwithbear.com.
Credit:
All original thoughts, analysis, and experience-based insights in this summary are sourced directly from Uncle Zo’s post: To Open Carry or Concealed Carry?. We highly encourage you to read the full article for a deeper dive into the context, rationale, and nuanced perspective he offers.
Become a Right To Bear member and get the backup you can trust